[Sebastián Salado; The 3 Heads of the Elephant]

The Interior Look

¿Reality or fiction?

Where this the Truth?

The majority of the discussions in this humanity they have been based on a simple dispute: ‘Who is in the certain thing and who lies '.

Torture victim has been killed and exterminated to entire towns only to be able to have the “possession of the truth” on a indisputable form. Although to reach that, they had to murder everyone who could discuss happiness truth...

A typical example of it has been the Catholic Inquisition, and even the own Church developed much before. As an example  of the peculiar way that the Catholic Church understood its own dogmas of Faith, we found this story, just as counts it Madame Blavatsky:

<< ¿Is Jesus Christ, a man, or God and man at the same time?... The discussion of this point him there is side to the ink rivers humanity and seas of blood; and nevertheless still subsists the doubt. In this, as in all, the councils have been contradicted several times, as shows the following recapitulation. This is History: The bishop Pablo of Samosata, denied the divinity of Christ in the first council of Antioquia, when still was in mantillas the theological Christianity. It called him "Son of God" only in consideration of the holiness of its life and works, but saying that its blood was corruptible in the sacrament of the Eucharist.

In the council of Nicaea, celebrated on the year 325, exposed Arrio his doctrines that were on the verge of breaking the unit of the faith. Seventeen bishops adhered to the doctrine of Arrio, who he was banished by maintaining them. Nevertheless, thirty years later (355), in the council of Milan, they signed three hundred bishops a message of adhesion. to the ideas of Arrio, to weigh that, in the second council of Antioquia (345), they had maintained the Eusebians that Jesus was a Son of God and consubstantial with the Father. In the council of Esmirna (357), the "Son" no longer was consubstantial, succeeding with it the Anomeans and Aryan, that denied that consubstantiality. A year later, the second council of Ancira decreed that the Son "was not consubstantial, but only similar in substance to the Father". The Pope Liberio sanctioned this decision.

During some centuries they debated and disputed the councils the most opposed opinions, until giving as fruit of its work the dogma of the Trinity that, like Minerva of the front of Jupiter, arose of the theological brain, armed with all the thunders, the Church. The new mystery was announced al world among terrible combats, sprinkled of blood. The council of Zaragoza (380) proclaimed that the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are the same person and that the human nature of Christ is pure illusion. 'Once in so slippery land, the Parents of the Church had to fall in the absurd'; because ¿how to deny human nature who is born of woman? The only judicious voice that was left to hear in one of the councils of Constantinople was the opinions of Eutiques, who had the value to say: "God free me to ponder on the nature of my God." For these words the Pope Flavio excommunicated him.

In the council of Efeso (449) he could be retaliated Eutiques, therefore, as Eusebio, the truthful bishop of Cesarea, incited him to admit two different natures in Christ, declares the council against Eusebio being proposed that Eusebio were burned alive. The bishops raised itself as a single man, and with the fists closed and full of rage, they asked that Eusebio were spitted in two, like he wanted to divide the nature of Jesus. Eutiques remained and returned in its Episcopal charge, and Eusebio and Flavio were deposed of its chairs. The two parties fought since then with large violence, arriving to the extreme that Saint Flavio died of the result of the bad deals inflicted to its person by the bishop Diodoro, who attacked him and gave him of kicks.

People observe in these councils the biggest incongruities that gave for fruit the obvious paradoxes that dogmas of the Church are called. >>

We see on this story how the groups institutionalized in the power maintain the same repressive patterns to reach the "absolute truth". The feeble and obsessive pursuit of the “heresy ” inside the own Catholic Church was followed by the shameless and systematic manipulation of all the historic documents which itself were not adjusted exactly to its nonsensical “dogmas of faith”, they were always a constant in the “Church of the Empire”, that invariably was a lot more worried about exterminating and to subdue the smaller discrepancies in its breast that in extending the message of Christ all over the world.

Even so, many spiritual beings embodied later inside and out of the Catholic Church to transmit the authentic liberating bequest of the 'Kingdom of the Skies' and of the Love, beings like Francisco of Asis, Teresa of Jesus, Juan of the Cross, the father Pío of Pietrelcina, along with other thinkers and mystical as San Augustine, they carried out the titanic task of the truth in the middle of a very hostile environment, to maintain alive the word and the work of the great liberating message of the Love.

Nevertheless, there were more evolutionary beings that are accounted among the torture victims and burned by the Inquisition, than among those what are high to the altars of the ‘Church of Jehovah'.

Although it can be believed that such facts do not pass to be 'historic curiosities', the certain thing is that the same form to resolve the problems continues being exercising in the assembly of the management organs of the present society. Of course, all is subtle with a layer of hypocrisy to seem 'politically correct'.

The truth today has a price and even quotes in the Market, and one must recognize that is a business more than respectable, thousands of political groups, associations and religious sects, agencies of press, “holdings” financial and even beneficial groups live only to possess the “truth”.

As a result of this, any intelligent man nowadays should know this thing: ‘distrusts of everyone who says to possess the truth'.

But this attitude in the great majority of cases is translated to the entelechy: ‘all is lie'. And it is exactly this attitude the one that constitutes the major moral cancer of this society.

I Am!

Let us imagine that the world tour to ours around, or better said that we have built a small universe to our measure. That world is therefore an image and resemblance of ourselves, possesses our defects and our virtues. All the beings that inhabit this universe form part of us and are projections of our own mind...

How would be that world? How do we imagine... it? Would be a world of peace and happiness or on the other side, a world of chaos and permanent conflicts. Who would we resort to make that this kind of world entered into the reason?

If we did not we give them intelligent capacity and own will, our personages only would move when we ordered them to move personally –what it would be quite boring-, and if we gave them own will... ¿How to control them?

We carry out a trip through our world recently created. What laws we would define for they? We would have to adjust to the same laws that we define for its own world survival? How would we present us to our personages: As a Terrible God, or like a loving Father?

This world that we have created playing with our own mind takes life exactly in our physical body, and with sadness we observe as there are disorders in our blood irrigation, the encims of our liver themselves revoked and our nerves tremble convulsed and scatterbrained. We decide to act and to convince to our red corpuscles to regulate its flow and to contribute in a regular way to contribute with the oxygen to the anxious and exhausted cells.

How do it? We would speak with all our corpuscles immediately or we would elect just only one as the leader of the crow and making influence we would try that he would enter in reason, so that guided to the others?...

We cross now the mirror to carry out this urgent task... no longer we see a form of microscopic and flattened

<< Grazed Moses the cattle of Jetro, his father-in-law, priest of Madián. Took him out there to  the desert one day; and arrived to the mount of God, Horeb, he appeared him himself the angel of YAHWEH in flame of fire out of the way of a bramble. Moses saw that the bramble burned itself and was not consumed, and told itself: ‘I Am going to see what great vision is this and which is the reason why it is not consumed the bramble'. YAHWEH saw that Moses approached to look at the flame and called out of the way of the bramble... ‘I am the God of your parents, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob... ' ‘I have seen the affliction of my people in Egypt and I have heard its clamors... ' ‘Go therefore; I  shipment you to go to the Pharaoh to said that remove to my people, to the children of Israel from Egypt'.

The Interior Being