Arcane
chronology of the Ages
Our friend Claudia:
Few times we receive mail from as much quality and
clarity as the one that Claudia sent us requesting some
information. Quickly the topic entered in a matter of
great interest general:
Which
is the chronological Age of the different Lost Continents and different Root Races?
That
disturbing and discussed topic has been and it continues being one of the
points key and Gordian knot of the Theosophical enigma to whose
clarification has not helped the always veiled comments of Madame
Blavatsky.
We don't seek to give in this article a magic recipe neither an
irrefutable solution of what understands each other as Hidden Chronology
of the Eras that understands from the Zodiacal Chronicles of Asura
Maya, the great Atlantean wise, who determined the duration of every
geologic period and cosmic past, until the references to the enigmatic
eras that they are defined in the Book of the
Dzyan given to know to the western world for Helena Petrovna Blavatsky,
in their quality and divulgational translation of the great spiritual
treasure that represents this arcane book.
information with the one that to build a homemade recipe that allows us to
develop our own theories and to reach some conclusions that, when
belonging us intellectually, they are always the correct ones for our
personal development.
The only indispensable requirement is 'wanted to know', everything the
rest will come in course of the time to us, it is only necessary to follow
this simple maxim as teaches us the Cabala:
<<
To looks for, to thinks, to combines, to imagines, and places each
creature in the role that the Creator has assigned him. [SEPHER JETZIRAH]
>>
This
way, Claudia contributes us in this article with the four cabalistic
conditions: Search, Reasoning, Combination and Imagination. Here we have
the data... Let us look for our own conclusions then:
(p) FIRST MAIL (Query):
Hello
Sebastián, very interesting your page, although I could not read it all
that had wanted for questions of time. Even this way, I will keep it in
mind for future consultations.
In fact, I gave with it when looking for some additional explanation of
the sotiacs cycles 1.461 year-old mentioned by Mr. Gerard Massey in
Natural The Genesis and mentioned by H. P. Blavatsky.
Now then, more than one (and perhaps to begin), I have two queries. The
first of them assaulted me when observing the following appreciation of H.
P. B.
She estimated that the Island of Easter, they were cyclopean remains, that
is to say part of a continent submerged in the seas, makes rather near
4.000.000 of years that of 20.000. (D. S. II, p. 141) now then; in that
the submersion of the Atlantis happened 850.000 years ago, as she becomes
trained in the Occult Buddhismo, the first statement can also be admitted
regarding the call Lemuria, the continent of the Third Root Race, almost
destroyed first by combustion and submerged later.
The matter in question is: If she also adds, when referring to the
Atlantis that the first gradual sinking of the same one had begun during
the Eocene period , how does this understand each other, being that the Eocene
began about 54 million years ago and did it conclude about 35,4 millions
ago?
And this is curious because in the same page she adds:
"According to emblem the Comment:
Having been the First Earth, purified for the Forty Nine Fires, their
inhabitants, born of the Fire and the Water, they could not die... the
Second Earth [with their Race] it disappeared in same way that the vapor
disappears in the air... The Third Earth saw waste away all the things on
her after the Separation, and he/she collapsed in the inferior Abyss [the
ocean]." Now then; a Recurrent Year is what we call Sidereal Year,
and it is based on the Procession of the Equinoxes. The duration of the
sidereal year is of 25.868 years; and therefore, the period mentioned in
the Comment is same in total to 4.242.352 years."
But how is it possible, if to indicate the first sinking of the Atlantis,
does she take reference to the Eocene that is older, being that both
know that the Lemuria went previous to the Atlantis?
Is the last query why you have not included the term " obscuration
" in your glossary?. Up to where I know, an obscuration is not the
same thing that a pralaya something in the book Letters of the Mahattmas
to Mr. Sinnet."
By now, thanked by any fact that you can share to help me.
Claudia.
(R) FIRST MAIL (RE: Query):
Dear Claudia,
Like
you, I am a simple searcher that gathers data, and tries to order them, by
meditating on them builds of their own reality; therefore my reality is as
valid as yours, as the one of Gerard Massey or that of Madame Blavatsky.
The search of each one is personal, we can learn in the opinions of other,
but the answers have to find them ourselves and nobody can tell us how to
do it, only to show us its own way that although it is not ours it serves
us as reference.
Nevertheless, I have to admit that I agree with you on the aspect of the
times of the Lemuria and the Atlantis. My humble opinion is that the
Lemuria (3ª Race) it is developed in the ends of the Mesozoic and
principles of the Tertiary, if we take like reference the animals that
engravings appear in the Stones of Ica in Ocucaje (Peru) and whose human
figures can relate with the Lemurs. Also, the reference of the big saurian
extinction that can be noticed between the Cretaceous and the Cenozoic (aprox..
65 million years) and that it would be comparable to the end of the Lemur
race.
The Atlantis age together with the continent of Mú would be very later
and its rising could be calculated in 1 million years.
As you can see I neither agree with Madame Blavatsky.
Nevertheless if you have some time download my book, The 3 Heads of the
Elephant:
http://www.sebastiansalado.com/esp/documents/Las_Tres_Cabezas_del_Elefante.pdf
If you can, reads starting from the page 195, I believe that it will solve
you some doubts.
About your second question, to include the term " oscuración ";
you also have reason, but they are so many things that I have in mind that
it overflows me by the dynamics of the own Web page.
Could I request you a favor...? Can you define yourself that concept,
together with other many that you consider appropriate and then to send it
to me to hang them in the page...?
My intention is, not to only be alone who exposes my ideas in the page, if
you have time any work that you want to send us it will be of great
utility.
Greetings.
Sebastián.
(p) SECOND MAIL (Answers - Article):
Appreciated Sebastián:
I
thank your answer deeply and you are right when you say that each one
should look for their answers starting from what unveiling one goes in the
search. In fact it happens to me that when I project some query to my
interior, in a way or other the answer appears, what should read as that
such a situation is presented for not importuning with my impatience to
others.
In fact, many times it is starting from certain queries that are presented
that I am able to advance in the answers that arise, and it was this way
like I found your site to read among other things part of what I was
seeing on the topic that he/she investigated and it was this way also how,
I only attach the first one, for not saturating you. They somehow, come
the queries that arose during the analysis of the data contributed by
Madame Blavatsky, to respond our doubts and I believe that somehow she
will also be able to clear yours, whenever we keep in mind that the Old
Lady was governed by Sidereal Years for their computations and that some
alone data could give them as insinuation so that we were developing our
intuition.
On the other hand to tell you that I will look for the data referred to
the obscuration in the book of Mr. Sinnet and I will send them to you. The
topic is something complex, because it is linked with data contributed
more recently, which arrive of very different currents, reason why I
continue analyzed these before pronouncing me in a particular comment on
the same ones.
When I will be able to download your book I would read the page that
you suggest, I will send you my opinion.
Greetings and thank you for your attention.
Claudia.
CHOSEN ARTICLES:
In
the following pages we find the articles that Claudia so kindly has made
us arrive, which are of great interest like base material in the
construction of our own conclusions and ideas that mistaken or not, they
will still continue being ours...
The material consists of three chosen articles, in which we will be able
to appreciate as the scientific evidences affirm that our world is 'as
formally real as it has to be' it is as much as an entelechy that role as
rotate the politics's winds or theeconomy power justifying those dogmas
that to the prevailing power in
 
The
depth determines the quality of the thought. The love determines the
quality of the gift. The truth determines the quality of the word.
[Lao
Tse, Tao Te
Ching]
|
